<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://shawnreeves.net//wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Concepts_first_or_practices_first</id>
	<title>Concepts first or practices first - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://shawnreeves.net//wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Concepts_first_or_practices_first"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://shawnreeves.net//wiki/index.php?title=Concepts_first_or_practices_first&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-11T16:45:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://shawnreeves.net//wiki/index.php?title=Concepts_first_or_practices_first&amp;diff=1259&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Shawn: Created page with &#039;Consider two approaches to science education: 1) Teach that there are concepts that you need to know to be a scientist; given those requisite concepts, these are the practices we…&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://shawnreeves.net//wiki/index.php?title=Concepts_first_or_practices_first&amp;diff=1259&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-01-12T19:59:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;Consider two approaches to science education: 1) Teach that there are concepts that you need to know to be a scientist; given those requisite concepts, these are the practices we…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Consider two approaches to science education:&lt;br /&gt;
1) Teach that there are concepts that you need to know to be a scientist; given those requisite concepts, these are the practices we use to get to that knowledge or to refine those concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Teach that there are practices of science you need to know to be a scientist; given those practices, these are some of the concepts we&amp;#039;ve found using such practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference may be subtle, and we may already use a mix of these two approaches. But are we biased towards the first approach over the second? If so, is that bias expressed in the resistance to the &amp;quot;nature of science&amp;quot; recommendations in standards-guidance documents, such as Benchmarks for Science Literacy?&amp;lt;bibref&amp;gt;AAAS:1993Benchmarks-for-AA&amp;lt;/bibref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bibreferences /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Studies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shawn</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>