Difference between revisions of "A broad look at the energy curriculum"

Revision as of 02:12, 13 July 2011

I will present an invited talk to the AAPT conference, August 1, 2011, 2:00PM - 2:30PM (part of a larger panel).

Title: A Broad Look at the Energy Curriculum
Description: Having consulted a broad sweep of educators teaching about energy for several years for EnergyTeachers.org, Mr. Reeves will comment on the integration of energy curriculum into the physics curriculum as well as the possibility of energy becoming its own field to rival the importance of physics. Learning new and even traditional energy concepts presents a challenge in the world of standardized or traditional curriculum, especially concerning sequence and rigor. Textbooks, professional development, lesson plans, field experiences, workforce training, and academic pathways need to be developed further. The content and structure of EnergyTeachers.org represents the wide range of answers to such challenges for K-16 and informal educators, but there is much work to be done. What role will physics educators have in this work?

building science coming into its own.: Building science, up to now, was taught as basic science concepts applicable to buildings, but now is so complex that it's its own field in every right.

My Father's Watch: Energy has been a theme for physics texts and courses for non-scientists. Many have attributed this association to the public interest in energy crises.
Preparation for energy careers
An interesting topic
Energy as examples for current curriculum, or part of a new curriculum?: In 'Adding a bit more history to science courses,'(The Physics Teacher v. 49 May 2011 pp. 282,283) William DeBuvitz begins to bridge two philosophies of the value of history in a physics course. The more naive philosophy is merely to pepper an existing course with stories of physicists. Such a treatment is a disservice for at least two reasons. It whittles the complexities of history to biographies of idealized, individualized actors, and it doesn't present the limits and controversies of historical interpretation. A more productive, intellectual philosophy might be to have students engage in historical research and/or argumentation.; A similar dichotomy may be applied to energy curriculum:Are we using energy to teach the same old curriculum, or are we willing to move our curriculum in new directions led by research in energy and society's plans for energy science and industry?

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ===Energy as its own field===
+;building science coming into its own.
+:Building science, up to now, was taught as basic science concepts applicable to buildings, but now is so complex that it's its own field in every right.
 ===Energy in physics education===