Difference between revisions of "Must physics basics come first?"

From ShawnReevesWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 180.139.139.13 (Talk) to last revision by Shawn)
(Undo revision 1965 by spammer)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 19:39, 5 January 2012

Issues

Physical science, the union and division of chemistry and physics

In a policy recommendation, the AAPT defended against the integration of physics and chemistry in a 2010 national standards document, arguing that "Since these disciplines have very different fundamental principles and discuss the principles using very different language; we believe that a more effective approach would be to explicitly define the core ideas for each discipline separately and then build bridges between the two content areas." http://www.aapt.org/Resources/policy/conceptualframeworks.cfm

What are basics

Are so-called basics prerequisites to learning?

In William Thomson's introductory lectures, he stated before any considerable progress can be made in a philosophical study of nature a thorough knowledge of dynamical principles is absolutely necessary. See p.241 of Sylvanus P. Thompson's The Life of William Thomson v.1, 1910.