|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''We are converting these to Bibwiki.'''
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Kaiser, David, Drawing Theories Apart:The dispersion of Feynman diagrams in postwar physics. 2005, University of Chicago Press. Recommended by Suman Seth.
| |
|
| |
| Title: Physics teaching in schools, 1960-85: Of people, policy, and power /
| |
| Author(s): Woolnough, Brian E.
| |
| Publication: London : Falmer Press,
| |
| Year: 1988.
| |
| Description: x, 269 p.
| |
| Series: Studies in curriculum history ;; 8;
| |
| SUBJECT(S)
| |
| Descriptor: Physics; Theoretical physics -- study and teaching.
| |
| Note(s): Includes index.
| |
| Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
| |
| Responsibility: Brian E. Woolnough.
| |
| Document Type: Monograph
| |
| Accession No: XISI33152-H
| |
| Database: HistSciTechMed
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Chronicle of Higher Education April 30, 1999
| |
| At Chicago Meeting, Defenders of Traditional Curriculum Assume Embattled Air
| |
| By ALISON SCHNEIDER
| |
| They're still grumbling.
| |
| Affirmative action is on the defensive. Campus speech codes are crumbling
| |
| http://chronicle.com/article/At-Chicago-Meeting-Defende/34798/
| |
|
| |
| Chronicle of Higher Education February 19, 1999
| |
| When Revising a Curriculum, Strategy May Trump Pedagogy
| |
| By ALISON SCHNEIDER
| |
| How Duke pulled off an overhaul while Rice saw its plans collapse
| |
| Curriculum reform often sparks more back-biting than back-patting. Coalitions form. Turf wars erupt. Lofty debate degenerates into low-stakes bickering. But there was little of that at Duke University last month.
| |
|
| |
| Chronicle of Higher Education May 28, 1999
| |
| Rice U. Approves Scaled-Down Plan to Revamp Curriculum
| |
| Lesson from the school of hard knocks: If you want to get a curriculum reform approved, don't make any big changes.
| |
| Last fall, efforts to revamp the core curriculum at Rice University went up in smoke after disgruntled professors thought they smelled a "postmodern plot" (The Chronicle, February 19).
| |
| The sticking point: "ways of knowing" -- five interdisciplinary approaches to knowledge. Critics thought
| |
