Possible studies: Difference between revisions
From ShawnReevesWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Can we determine how people differentiate textbooks from Amazon comments?=== | ===Can we determine how people differentiate textbooks from Amazon comments?=== | ||
How can we process comments for analysis? With example methods, can we pattern opinions of physics textbooks? | How can we process comments for analysis? With example methods, can we pattern opinions of physics textbooks? | ||
===Did citations in 1910s journals match nationalism of entire journal?=== | |||
Considering Annalen der Physik, Le Radium, or Nature, did the proportion of international citations exceed or underrepresent the internationality of authorship? Inspired by presentation on Rutherford by Melinda Baldwin at [[HSS 2011]]. | |||
[[Category:Studies]] | [[Category:Studies]] | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 4 November 2011
Research I'd like to do
Online electronics tutorials
Do the tutorials belie a certain subset of electronics hobbyists and professionals, perhaps leaning towards the pedagogues or the retirees, or people paid well, or people not paid well?
The teapot versus the bouncing ball:The hello world of 3D and animation
http://jlongster.com/s/dom3d/example3.html
What would be a good high school STS course?
We might refer to "Science/Technology/Society As Reform In Science Education" editor Robert Yager, 1996.
Can we determine how people differentiate textbooks from Amazon comments?
How can we process comments for analysis? With example methods, can we pattern opinions of physics textbooks?
Did citations in 1910s journals match nationalism of entire journal?
Considering Annalen der Physik, Le Radium, or Nature, did the proportion of international citations exceed or underrepresent the internationality of authorship? Inspired by presentation on Rutherford by Melinda Baldwin at HSS 2011.
