Difference between revisions of "Must physics basics come first?"

From ShawnReevesWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 180.139.139.13 (Talk) to last revision by Shawn)
Line 1: Line 1:
That's a genuinely impressive anwser.
+
==Issues==
 +
===Physical science, the union and division of chemistry and physics===
 +
In a policy recommendation, the AAPT defended against the integration of physics and chemistry in a 2010 national standards document, arguing that "Since these disciplines have very different fundamental principles and discuss the principles using very different language; we believe that a more effective approach would be to explicitly define the core ideas for each discipline separately and then build bridges between the two content areas." http://www.aapt.org/Resources/policy/conceptualframeworks.cfm
 +
 
 +
===What are basics===
 +
 
 +
===Are so-called basics prerequisites to learning?===
 +
In William Thomson's introductory lectures, he stated before any considerable progress can be made in a philosophical study of nature a thorough knowledge of dynamical principles is absolutely necessary. See p.241 of Sylvanus P. Thompson's The Life of William Thomson v.1, 1910.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Teaching]]

Revision as of 21:22, 3 January 2012

Issues

Physical science, the union and division of chemistry and physics

In a policy recommendation, the AAPT defended against the integration of physics and chemistry in a 2010 national standards document, arguing that "Since these disciplines have very different fundamental principles and discuss the principles using very different language; we believe that a more effective approach would be to explicitly define the core ideas for each discipline separately and then build bridges between the two content areas." http://www.aapt.org/Resources/policy/conceptualframeworks.cfm

What are basics

Are so-called basics prerequisites to learning?

In William Thomson's introductory lectures, he stated before any considerable progress can be made in a philosophical study of nature a thorough knowledge of dynamical principles is absolutely necessary. See p.241 of Sylvanus P. Thompson's The Life of William Thomson v.1, 1910.