Difference between revisions of "EDUC 6470 Week 6"
(French and Russell) |
(Crawford et al. 1999) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Are the facilitators getting enough credit for their work? Is the experience worth the same (or more) as the pay they deserve? | Are the facilitators getting enough credit for their work? Is the experience worth the same (or more) as the pay they deserve? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Crawford, Krajcik, and Marx, 1999 | ||
+ | I wonder whether well-contextualized inquiries are often taught at the same conceptual level as a lessened-inquiry science course for the same age? I'm thinking about physics majors, and whether a high energy theorist could spring from a curriculum path that involved much more inquiry. Often physics professors tell me their fine with radical reforms for their non-majors courses. |
Revision as of 15:51, 2 March 2010
Readings
- French and Russell, 2002
The authors write about how their intro biology course for mixed majors is based on scenarios, leading questions, and group work periods. Tools include concept maps and flow charts. The course tightens the circle of training the trainers by having seniors and grads interested in education be the facilitators for the freshman class. Facilitators act as a sort of super note-taker, keeping the thinking of the student body in line with expectations and directions, making explicit the links in the curriculum, for example showing a concept map from the previous lecture to emphasize/reinforce the constructivist nature of the learning. The facilitator allows the instructor not to get distracted by either the A/V equipment, paper handouts, or homework collection.
Are the facilitators getting enough credit for their work? Is the experience worth the same (or more) as the pay they deserve?
- Crawford, Krajcik, and Marx, 1999
I wonder whether well-contextualized inquiries are often taught at the same conceptual level as a lessened-inquiry science course for the same age? I'm thinking about physics majors, and whether a high energy theorist could spring from a curriculum path that involved much more inquiry. Often physics professors tell me their fine with radical reforms for their non-majors courses.